4 ms·
Ah right, I tend to think the tech bubble is the default context for stuff posted on HN, but of course that's just my bias. I think staff engineers are slightl
by t8sr 3y ago
Ah right, I tend to think the tech bubble is the default context for stuff posted on HN, but of course that's just my bias.
I think staff engineers are slightly more common than first level EMs, but senior EMs are slightly more common than senior staff. Beyond that, it's small numbers and hard to draw conclusions. The nuance I've felt is that promotions to staff and up on the IC ladder are more in your control, while EM promotions are very much about being in the right place at the right time, in addition to being ready for the role.
I have worked at "normal" companies as well, and I think the EM role there is slightly different? To me it seemed like it's people management + technical, while in the tech bubble, that would be called "TLM". "Pure" EMs are mostly doing people management only, with strategy and XFN alignment. Does that sound correct to you?
- thoughtspile 3y agoGood point on the control over your promotions, it's something I experienced when moving into an EM role. Banging my head until hitting an actual growth team. I come from Russia, we're not exactly known for great people management, and I'd say management up to department head is expected to handle the tech part as well even in larger companies such as Yandex / VK. This fits your definition of normal companies perfectly.
- rsynnott 3y ago> I think staff engineers are slightly more common than first level EMs That’s going to depend a lot on company (and how they define staff vs senior; that varies quite a bit).
- ajmurmann 3y agoBeyond being in the right place at the right time, the higher EM promotions are also more obviously zero-sum, since there is a clear number of roles and only one person can get a role. Dynamics for ICs at higher levels are somewhat similar but not as clear cut