4 ms·
Well in this case you weren't wrong about the first 10^10 numbers: > the smallest counterexample is n = 906,150,257, found by Minoru Tanaka in 1980.[5]
by ozyschmozy 3y ago
Well in this case you weren't wrong about the first 10^10 numbers:
> the smallest counterexample is n = 906,150,257, found by Minoru Tanaka in 1980.[5]