4 ms·
>The invasion of Ukraine is primarily a desire of conquest. No. It is personal desire of Putin to remain in power. Conquest has nothing to do with it either.
by Ray20 3y ago
>The invasion of Ukraine is primarily a desire of conquest.
No. It is personal desire of Putin to remain in power. Conquest has nothing to do with it either.
- emptysongglass 3y agoI'm not sure how you arrived at that conclusion given the available evidence we have of Putin's many speeches and writings on the matter. And one is not mutually exclusive of the other.
- Ray20 3y agoYeah, and he also gave many speeches and writings about how he is fighting Nazism in Ukraine. Are we seriously going to discuss Putin's speeches? This Putin's rhetoric did not exist before the 2014 revolution in Ukraine.
- mopsi 3y agoIt did exist. Putin's speech at the Munich Security Conference in 2007 is one of the best-known examples: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Munich_speech_of_Vladimir_Putin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Munich_speech_of_Vladimir... His intentions have been obvious for a very long time for anyone who wants to see them. The recent Tucker Carlson interview confirmed that Putin has an uncontrollable obsession with a made up version of history, and he gets visibly upset when his long rants about Ukrainian statehood being an anti-Russian conspiracy by the Austrian General Staff and the Pope get interrupted. Nazis running Ukraine is only a small part of that persecution complex. Putin's speeches deserve as serious consideration as Hitler's. Until tanks started rolling, his speeches were also dismissed as rhetoric.