4 ms·
Probably because they felt confident they could set a precedent would be my guess. Of course the argument is absurd, but this is exactly where companies like t
by SuperNinKenDo 3y ago
Probably because they felt confident they could set a precedent would be my guess.
Of course the argument is absurd, but this is exactly where companies like this would love to go. Virtually free support staff that incur the company absolutely no liability whatsoever.
- ryandrake 3y agoMaybe companies are so used to their $multimillion dollar legal teams winning against broke Average Joes that their legal departments are starting to just assume that it will always happen and that all court precedents are going to be favorable. They've been sniffing their own farts for so long they think it's fresh air.
- astrange 3y agoIf you sue a company in small claims having an expensive legal team doesn't help them that much.
- SuperNinKenDo 3y agoCould you elaborate?
- astrange 3y agoMostly all the expensive procedures aren't allowed, there isn't a jury so it moves faster, and in some places lawyers aren't allowed in court even to represent a business.