3 ms·
I wish "reuse" had more focus than "recycle" since it's so much more feasible. You don't need science to do reuse. You just need logistics. For example, if mor
by AlienRobot 3y ago
I wish "reuse" had more focus than "recycle" since it's so much more feasible. You don't need science to do reuse. You just need logistics.
For example, if more people bought used goods instead of brand new ones, less goods would need be produced in first place, which would be great for humanity in general.
- al_borland 3y agoAnd “reduce” should get even more focus than that. People don’t need most of the garbage they buy. Of course, that would be bad for the economy, so we don’t talk about that anymore. Anything reused or recycled will at some point become waste, but if it isn’t produced in the first place, that’s ideal. It obviously won’t work for everything, but it can work for a significant amount of things. The entirety of Temu and Shein would be a good start.