4 ms·
Not a fan of the “main” branch revolution? Pretty good config though. Personally, I use diff configs depending on oss vs personal vs work. So I combine mine wi
by xyst 3y ago
Not a fan of the “main” branch revolution?
Pretty good config though. Personally, I use diff configs depending on oss vs personal vs work. So I combine mine with “[includeIf gitdir:~/oss…]” …
Some companies like G have some weird requirements.
- chungy 3y agoNo, I'm not a fan of it. It's been master since forever and it's a perfectly good term, fits regular English convention of "master branch" too. > Personally, I use diff configs depending on oss vs personal vs work. So I combine mine with “[includeIf gitdir:~/oss…]” … I'd stuff such things into the local repos' .git/config files instead of the global. It's rare that I do it, but sometimes I do work with projects with differing conventions.
- influx 3y agoI liked it more once I realized it was fewer characters to type.
- worksonmine 3y agoTyping 'ma<Tab>' is the same in both cases. I don't like the change because the reason behind the change is political. Give an inch take a mile etc, it's getting out of hand. But I don't care enough to stand out.
- imbnwa 3y ago>Not a fan of the “main” branch revolution? Why not 'canon'?
- NateEag 3y ago"canon" is for the central repo, the blessed source of truth.