3 ms·
`git gui` seems to be the easiest solution to me. The interface is not pretty, but it does what one would expect and it’s fast.
by pantalaimon 3y ago
`git gui` seems to be the easiest solution to me.
The interface is not pretty, but it does what one would expect and it’s fast.
- danhorner 3y agoI came here to say this. `git gui` is nearly ubiquitous and has saved me for years from learning how to use `git add -p`. I don't use many graphical git tools but its options "stage hunk" and "stage line" are more intuitive and fine-grained than the hunk-splitting in `git add -p`
- from-nibly 3y agoI'm a native git guy in general, but `git gui` has absolutely won my heart. I don't know what I'd do without it for staging partial commits. That and searching through stashes.
- zilti 3y agoWhy use git gui when you can use magit
- fransje26 3y agoBecause... != emacs?
- rk06 3y agogit etensions do a better job