Just that something is largely written in Lisp, doesn't make it a "Lisp Machine", nor a clone of it. > but compromised and/or modified for the environments we

Just that something is largely written in Lisp, doesn't make it a "Lisp Machine", nor a clone of it. > but compromised and/or modified for the environments we have now. I would think that GNU Emacs is also compromised by its own design decisions, starting in 1984, when RMS rewrote Gosling Emacs.