3 ms·

Do you see any irony to posting this at almost exactly the same time as the $355 million fraud ruling was announced? https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinio

Do you see any irony to posting this at almost exactly the same time as the $355 million fraud ruling was announced? https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/trump-new-york-fraud-verdict-criminal-trials-rcna139002 https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/trump-new-york-f... Where do you normally get your news that is telling you these things? You have a lot of claims in your comments, but I haven't seen any evidence.

docmars 3y ago
[flagged]
- CyberDildonics 3y ago
  You realize he already owes 443 million dollars and improper behavior by a prosecutor doesn't exonerate him from his 91 indictments right? Arguing about this is a little silly, but what would actually be interesting is for you to link where you get your news.
  - docmars 3y ago
    Trump practically made $4 billion today with the DWAC merger getting the nod to proceed. This "fine" is nothing.
    - CyberDildonics 3y ago
      Your claim above was This string of lawsuits are mostly failing though. What does this have to do with that claim when the last two lawsuits have ended in both guilt and substantial judgements?
      - docmars 3y ago
        Enjoy! https://youtu.be/wXMqpU5DZyo?si=Je1YJYodpv4JQRPv https://youtu.be/wXMqpU5DZyo?si=Je1YJYodpv4JQRPv
        CyberDildonics 3y ago
        This is a youtube video with 600 views of someone looking at articles about the georgia criminal case. You realize this is unrelated to the sexual assault and defamation lawsuit and fraud lawsuit that trump just lost right?
    - dctoedt 3y ago
      > Trump practically made $4 billion today with the DWAC merger getting the nod to proceed. Your use of "practically" is doing a lot of work there ....
      - docmars 3y ago
        Is the DWAC merger happening or not? There's no probable reason it wouldn't, so Trump stands to gain $4bn from his shares soon enough. I'm using "practically" effectively, in spite of whatever dismissive dialogue you're trying for here.

docmars 3y ago

[flagged]

CyberDildonics 3y ago
You realize he already owes 443 million dollars and improper behavior by a prosecutor doesn't exonerate him from his 91 indictments right? Arguing about this is a little silly, but what would actually be interesting is for you to link where you get your news.
- docmars 3y ago
  Trump practically made $4 billion today with the DWAC merger getting the nod to proceed. This "fine" is nothing.
  - CyberDildonics 3y ago
    Your claim above was This string of lawsuits are mostly failing though. What does this have to do with that claim when the last two lawsuits have ended in both guilt and substantial judgements?
    - docmars 3y ago
      Enjoy! https://youtu.be/wXMqpU5DZyo?si=Je1YJYodpv4JQRPv https://youtu.be/wXMqpU5DZyo?si=Je1YJYodpv4JQRPv
      - CyberDildonics 3y ago
        This is a youtube video with 600 views of someone looking at articles about the georgia criminal case. You realize this is unrelated to the sexual assault and defamation lawsuit and fraud lawsuit that trump just lost right?
  - dctoedt 3y ago
    > Trump practically made $4 billion today with the DWAC merger getting the nod to proceed. Your use of "practically" is doing a lot of work there ....
    - docmars 3y ago
      Is the DWAC merger happening or not? There's no probable reason it wouldn't, so Trump stands to gain $4bn from his shares soon enough. I'm using "practically" effectively, in spite of whatever dismissive dialogue you're trying for here.