This person is an unhinged libertarian. > What seems more obvious to me is that most people strongly dislike the idea of for-profit government. They actually g

This person is an unhinged libertarian. > What seems more obvious to me is that most people strongly dislike the idea of for-profit government. They actually greatly prefer autocrats who substantially serve personal ends! They assume that just because they don't want a failed form of capitalism running their government that they must embrace autocrats. They also assume that for-profit corps do things "better" and for "cheaper". This is flatly wrong and I can show it on my garbage bill. While I can't show it on my Internet bill due to former state law, I can also tell you that government-operated FTTH is significantly cheaper than for-profit companies running the same fiber based on a municipality that did get fiber in prior to enacting said state law. What kind of wrong-think is this blog post? Can't we have people for people and not libertarians for $$$ and fuck-the-rest?