3 ms·
I think I fell in love with emacs when I realized that individual key presses could be scripted. Or possibly when I wrapped my head around macro injection. Hard
by shadowgovt 3y ago
I think I fell in love with emacs when I realized that individual key presses could be scripted. Or possibly when I wrapped my head around macro injection. Hard to say, this thing grew on me from being an absolute space alien of an architecture to the first tool in the toolbox I reach for if I've got a new project to tackle.
My advice to people when editor wars come up is that going deep on something is more important than going deep on the right thing. emacs versus vi? No strong opinion. I happened to learn emacs first and would be repeating a lot of labor to go as deep on vi.
(... But I do tend to give a slight nudge in the direction of something of that ilk because relative to say, VS code... Those editors have already stood the test of time, they aren't beholden to one owner, and while past performance is not proof of future expectations, there's a lot of people heavily invested in keeping both of them alive and thriving).
- dingnuts 3y ago> I happened to learn emacs first and would be repeating a lot of labor to go as deep on vi. Speaking as someone who used vim for 10 years before getting sniped by Emacs (ten years ago.. shit I'm getting old): vim isn't as deep as Emacs, it's not even close. vim is only as deep as evil-mode. In fact, vim has a UX paradigm that's out-of-the-ordinary, and that's it. That's why in Emacs, modal editing is just another minor mode..
- _fsql 3y ago[dead]
- PaulDavisThe1st 3y agoYes the day you find out that in GNU Emacs, the "u" key is actually bound to (self-insert-command) and thus can instead be made to do anything ... well,it's quite a day.