I'm not sure that I'd bet on this being found unconscionable, especially since it's a grant to Spotify, not a restriction on the customer, which is where most o

I'm not sure that I'd bet on this being found unconscionable, especially since it's a grant to Spotify, not a restriction on the customer, which is where most of the existing case law (AFAIK) rests. The argument, from Spotify's point of view, is that its customers are freely signing a contract to distribute their audiobooks through Spotify's marketplace, and they are choosing to accept ... whatever the fuck it is Spotify's trying to do with that clause. It's ugly, very very ugly, but probably a valid contract.