3 ms·
You're describing A.I. as a black box of proprietary workings, far beyond any mortal's personal budget to create, and too complex anyway, which internally runs
by geor9e 3y ago
You're describing A.I. as a black box of proprietary workings, far beyond any mortal's personal budget to create, and too complex anyway, which internally runs in a language unintelligible to humans, and through layers and layers of abstractions, has a human-readable interface. To me, that exactly describes an x64 or ARM CPU. But since we are not children freshly learning about reality, we don't see these two black boxes in front of us in the same light. One is something we just got used to kinda-understanding-but-not-really decade after decade. One is something brand new to us.
- dleslie 3y agox64 and ARM emulators exist, the code for some are quite legible. There's a whole community of folks who build RiscV implementations from verilog or vhdl. In my own experience at university, decades ago, we built functioning HC11 CPUs out of logic gates and wrote assembler for them. I'll admit that there's a definite and clear accessibility curve to building a CPU, but it's nowhere near as opaque as the binary blobs one can access for AI tooling.
- entropicdrifter 3y agoNow I want to go and play NandGame again... https://nandgame.com/ https://nandgame.com/
- paulmd 3y agoI hear really good things about turing complete https://store.steampowered.com/app/1444480/Turing_Complete/ https://store.steampowered.com/app/1444480/Turing_Complete/
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- asadotzler 3y agoX86 and ARM are open in many many ways that for example ChatGPT isn't.