4 ms·
OK this kind of reminds of CPUs. Sure with a good amount of time and effort you could fully understand every single minute facet and detail that goes into basi
by MeImCounting 3y ago
OK this kind of reminds of CPUs.
Sure with a good amount of time and effort you could fully understand every single minute facet and detail that goes into basic x86 CPU. You wouldn't be able to grok every single operation that happens inside when it produces some output but you can definitely understand the fundamentals and have an intuitive understanding of the internals. You the average hobbyist or programmer would be able with significant investment create a photolithography setup at home and even create one of your designs. None of this would be anywhere near the scale, performance or quality of the products coming out of big companies. You just dont have the expertise or hardware to make a product anywhere near a current gen CPU. Does that make you sad?
Obviously theres a difference here in that AI is "software" but the comparison is apt I feel. It is clearly a different class of software than fun webpages and video games from the 90s. Just like the CPUs and GPUs of today are a different class of hardware than what you can build at home. Even with much education and resources, both are out of reach.
- qsort 3y agoThe difference is that CPUs/GPUs are deterministic. You can write software and it will always work, and it will be composable. It's kind of "disappointing" that for so many problems the "winning" approach seems to be "just download internet.tar.gz".
- MeImCounting 3y agoWhy is it not disappointing that for decades now the winning approach was just to give up on using your homemade CPU and get something from Intel instead?