> So, the expression > 1, 1+1, 2+1, ():set > builds the set with the three elements 1, 2 and 3 Regarding the "():set" part, and the "():something" idiom repe

> So, the expression > 1, 1+1, 2+1, ():set > builds the set with the three elements 1, 2 and 3 Regarding the "():set" part, and the "():something" idiom repeating in the article, is that from the same competition for the most absurd syntax where Golang got most of its awkwardness?