7 ms·

Your comment sounds disingenuous. Talking about alternative ideas is the start. Arguably the most dangerous part.

by stephenitis 3y ago

seanw444 3y ago
Yeah, what's he supposed to do? Head a frontal assault on the Kremlin? Dude's a political figure. His job is to talk.
- MrDresden 3y ago
  The job he chose was to inspire people, and show them a way to protest from within the system (the strategic voting system he and his followers published).
  - secondary_op 3y ago
    [flagged]
    - MrDresden 3y ago
      Let's wait and see what his legacy will be.
    - unethical_ban 3y ago
      In America, when the two party system is criticized and people push for changes to the way we vote, we don't get put in prison or poisoned with nerve gas or radioactive tea.
      - docmars 3y ago
        [flagged]
        unethical_ban 3y ago
        I literally have no idea what you're talking about. Could you explain who has been a victim of this? Please don't say the former president who has worked hard to delay trials.
        docmars 3y ago
        [flagged]
        2OEH8eoCRo0 3y ago
        https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/16/nyregion/trump-civil-fraud-trial-ruling.html https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/16/nyregion/trump-civil-frau... > Trump Is Ordered to Pay $355 Million and Is Barred From New York Business :)
        docmars 3y ago
        > Trump will appeal this and probably win :)
        deleted 3y ago
        [deleted]
        CyberDildonics 3y ago
        What evidence are you basing that on?
        docmars 3y ago
        1. The outcomes are very clearly politically motivated. 2. The bank CEOs who testified agreed that there was no wrongdoing on Trump's part. The loans are paid. 3. There is no victim in the case. ("bUt thE StaTe..." [eyeroll]) 4. Kevin O'Leary condemns the ruling as baseless and corrupt. That's kind of a big deal. [https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1759639865174729101 https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/17596398651747291...] --- On a related note, look at the kinds of people who are going after Trump: 1. We have Fani Willis and her little boyfriend in Georgia using cash she pulled out of her campaign to evade accountability (that's a felony). 2. We have this little pr*ck filing lawsuits in every state to have Trump removed from their ballots, being arrested and charged with filing 17 sets of false tax documents to the IRS. [https://twitter.com/rickydoggin/status/1759623388509929853 https://twitter.com/rickydoggin/status/1759623388509929853] 3. We have Letitia James whose sole campaign promise was to "get Trump at any cost" -- seems like they're willing to make up anything for a political win, even if it's a complete lie. Can't trust someone whose mission is clearly a witch hunt. Integrity doesn't matter to them. ...and they want to insinuate that Trump is corrupt? Talk about hypocrisy. These are the people who are entrusted with "getting Trump", seriously? This should ruin your trust in anyone going after Trump and increase your scrutiny towards those who (apparently) have no integrity or basis for going after this guy. This is why conservatives rightly have a strong argument against this witch hunt, any why they feel justified in continuing to support Trump. Find us someone whose record is clean, and then we can talk.
      - macromagnon 3y ago
        Nothing happens to random people with no power, but if a legitimate threat to the status quo appeared, I don't think it would end up so peaceful.

Your comment sounds disingenuous. Talking about alternative ideas is the start. Arguably the most dangerous part.

seanw444 3y ago

Yeah, what's he supposed to do? Head a frontal assault on the Kremlin? Dude's a political figure. His job is to talk.

MrDresden 3y ago
The job he chose was to inspire people, and show them a way to protest from within the system (the strategic voting system he and his followers published).
- secondary_op 3y ago
  [flagged]
  - MrDresden 3y ago
    Let's wait and see what his legacy will be.
  - unethical_ban 3y ago
    In America, when the two party system is criticized and people push for changes to the way we vote, we don't get put in prison or poisoned with nerve gas or radioactive tea.
    - docmars 3y ago
      [flagged]
      - unethical_ban 3y ago
        I literally have no idea what you're talking about. Could you explain who has been a victim of this? Please don't say the former president who has worked hard to delay trials.
        docmars 3y ago
        [flagged]
        2OEH8eoCRo0 3y ago
        https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/16/nyregion/trump-civil-fraud-trial-ruling.html https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/16/nyregion/trump-civil-frau... > Trump Is Ordered to Pay $355 Million and Is Barred From New York Business :)
        docmars 3y ago
        > Trump will appeal this and probably win :)
        deleted 3y ago
        [deleted]
        CyberDildonics 3y ago
        What evidence are you basing that on?
        docmars 3y ago
        1. The outcomes are very clearly politically motivated. 2. The bank CEOs who testified agreed that there was no wrongdoing on Trump's part. The loans are paid. 3. There is no victim in the case. ("bUt thE StaTe..." [eyeroll]) 4. Kevin O'Leary condemns the ruling as baseless and corrupt. That's kind of a big deal. [https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1759639865174729101 https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/17596398651747291...] --- On a related note, look at the kinds of people who are going after Trump: 1. We have Fani Willis and her little boyfriend in Georgia using cash she pulled out of her campaign to evade accountability (that's a felony). 2. We have this little pr*ck filing lawsuits in every state to have Trump removed from their ballots, being arrested and charged with filing 17 sets of false tax documents to the IRS. [https://twitter.com/rickydoggin/status/1759623388509929853 https://twitter.com/rickydoggin/status/1759623388509929853] 3. We have Letitia James whose sole campaign promise was to "get Trump at any cost" -- seems like they're willing to make up anything for a political win, even if it's a complete lie. Can't trust someone whose mission is clearly a witch hunt. Integrity doesn't matter to them. ...and they want to insinuate that Trump is corrupt? Talk about hypocrisy. These are the people who are entrusted with "getting Trump", seriously? This should ruin your trust in anyone going after Trump and increase your scrutiny towards those who (apparently) have no integrity or basis for going after this guy. This is why conservatives rightly have a strong argument against this witch hunt, any why they feel justified in continuing to support Trump. Find us someone whose record is clean, and then we can talk.
    - macromagnon 3y ago
      Nothing happens to random people with no power, but if a legitimate threat to the status quo appeared, I don't think it would end up so peaceful.