3 ms·
I checked out their issues and learned their moderation team has "enforcers" https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/issues/78 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/gove
by lagniappe 3y ago
I checked out their issues and learned their moderation team has "enforcers" https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/issues/78 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/issues/78
- Kwpolska 3y agoAnd they're silencing constructive criticism by editing comments (removing their content).
- radlad 3y agoWow, those removed comments tell the whole story. (You can click "edited" to see the original message.)
- kstrauser 3y agoOh dear. I like Code of Conducts. I put my pronouns on stuff. I moderate a largely LGBTQ community. I am absolutely, 100% in favor of DEI and making sure people in minority groups feel safe and comfortable contributing to the communities I'm in. And I think those comment edits are a very bad look for the project. I don't know the people involved at all. Maybe the person applying to be a moderator is an angel of a person, and the people opposed to their appointment are awful. I have no idea. But what I saw there was someone raising concerns about a specific person's behavior, and their comments being essentially deleted as ad-hominem attacks. That doesn't sound right to me. The person wasn't saying "you smell funny so I'm ignoring your argument". They were saying "you did some things in a previous role that made me think you're not a good fit for this one". I didn't interpret it as an ad-hominem attack at all. I hope this is a tempest in a teapot that blows over quickly.