Obviously high-end consumer CPUs already have about 30MB of on-chip memory, with server CPUs reaching a solid 300MB. We just prefer to call it L2 and L3 cache.

Obviously high-end consumer CPUs already have about 30MB of on-chip memory, with server CPUs reaching a solid 300MB. We just prefer to call it L2 and L3 cache. If we add more memory in a chiplet format I suspect mainstream CPUs would simply expose (or rather hide) it as L3 or L4 cache. Most software isn't even NUMA aware, and would completely fail to take advantage of a tiered memory hierarchy if it was given the option. But if we make the fast memory a big cache and let the CPU worry about it it's a "cheap" win. Though there is the Xeon Phi which has about 16GB of on-package memory that can either be configured as cache or as "scratchpad" memory. But of course that's not meant for general-purpose software