3 ms·

> I just want a 2003 Google experience. Google in 2003 was good because the web wasn't quite so full of utter garbage. There must be 100x more content at least

• dspillett 3y ago
  That is only going to get worse, with the direct copies of StackOverflow and other popular sites (which are easy enough for search engines to filter out because the body content is practically identical) that exist only to fool less careful clickers into getting their adverts & such, being joined by a multitude of LLM generated rewordings of the same which will be harder to automatically drop (or de-prioritise).
  • nusl 3y ago
    I’ve used browser addons to help with filtering the search spam too. I think uBlacklist? It has lists of sites that are often helpful
• eitland 3y ago
  Everyone says this. But Kagi often being as good as Google used to be proves this isn't the only reason. Lately I have felt Kagi also sometimes stray down this "knows better than me what I want" path. I recommend using the forums to let them know. They actually read the forums and act on it. I've reported both ux improvements and search quality issues and more and they have always taken it seriously.