If corporations can use CFAA to go after individuals, individuals should be able to enforce CFAA against organizations as well. I gave one example, but there a

If corporations can use CFAA to go after individuals, individuals should be able to enforce CFAA against organizations as well. I gave one example, but there are many others. It's used (alongside DMCA) to lock down all sorts of devices around your home or to give draconian criminal penalties to what should be civil employee-employeer issues. So long as that's the case, then if I have a technological measure to protect my data and privacy, and you come up with some scheme to circumvent it and fingerprint my browser anyways, I should have a CFAA case against a corporation who tries to break it. I can go down a few rabbitholes of why being able to modify content is important to individuals with disabilities, or a plethora of other reasons why these things are harmful, but the short story is that you shouldn't be able to break things on my computer. Here is the text: (7) with intent to extort from any person any money or other thing of value, transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any— (B) threat to obtain information from a protected computer without authorization or in excess of authorization or to impair the confidentiality of information obtained from a protected computer without authorization or by exceeding authorized access; As interpreted in the reverse direction, if: (a) Youtube is trying to extort me to subscribe or watch ads for financial benefit (b) To do so, attempts to detect my ad blocker (which very clear goes beyond authorized access) They've committed a criminal act.