>How could this possibly pass peer review? Not just peer review, Frontiers claims "out editorial office conducts a pre-screening for validation of research int

>How could this possibly pass peer review? Not just peer review, Frontiers claims "out editorial office conducts a pre-screening for validation of research integrity and quality standards" before that point. There's also supposed to be a "final validation" phase where they go over it again. It shouldn't have made it to peer review and shouldn't have made it out of it.