4 ms·
The future is probably mediocre. Things that are "good enough" replace real craftsmanship.
by sva_ 3y ago
The future is probably mediocre. Things that are "good enough" replace real craftsmanship.
- hermitcrab 3y agoHence the washing machine that dies 1 week after the warranty expires. Yay for capitalism!
- jay_kyburz 3y agoI imagine its quite difficult to get a washing machine to die as close as possible to the end of the warranty, but not before it. Just one week must take some real skill.
- hermitcrab 3y agoPrecision enshittification. You'll soon be able to do a masters degree in it.
- blooalien 3y ago> "Precision enshittification. You'll soon be able to do a masters degree in it." Only until someone trains an "AI" model to do it automatically... ;~)
- brnt 3y agoI suppose manufacturing washing machines that reliably give up the ghost months within warranty expiry is its own kind of impressive.
- hermitcrab 3y agoNot that hard when they have a processor in that knows the date or an Internet connection. I'm not suggesting anyone has done that yet. But only a matter of time, surely?
- Arrath 3y agoGreat, I can't wait for appliances that stuxnet themselves shortly after their warranty period. New home automation hack: have your pi-hole pull double duty by running a local, pirate NTP server that forever makes the appliances think they're only a year old.
- RecycledEle 3y agoGE washing machines did exactly that.
- hermitcrab 3y agohave you got a link for that?
- Gud 3y agoExcept where it is needed the most. I doubt you’ll get a fusion reactor running with sloppy craftsmanship. I install heavy machinery for a living. The devices I install simply won’t work unless I do it near perfect.
- skenderbeu 3y agoSimpson's predicted that
- RecycledEle 3y agoI disagree. AI makes us all better. AI makes the fastest possible draft faster. AI makes the best possible quality output better. The problem is that some people go for volume over quality. How do we name and shame those people?
- smsm42 3y agoThat thing isn't even "good enough". I mean it literally has label "dck" on it. Not even "dick", "dck". It's hilariously bad for anyone bothering to look for like 5 seconds, and yet it was supposedly peer-reviewed by multiple serious scientists, and absolutely hilariously awful diagrams were just fine. I don't think it raises to the level of "mediocre", it's more like "anything goes as long at it looks pretty from afar".