3 ms·
I don't think they are a lot worse: https://twitter.com/sama/status/1758218059716939853 https://twitter.com/sama/status/1758218059716939853 https://twitter.co
by Kiro 3y ago
I don't think they are a lot worse:
https://twitter.com/sama/status/1758218059716939853 https://twitter.com/sama/status/1758218059716939853
https://twitter.com/sama/status/1758218820542763012 https://twitter.com/sama/status/1758218820542763012
https://twitter.com/sama/status/1758219575882301608 https://twitter.com/sama/status/1758219575882301608
https://twitter.com/sama/status/1758220311735181384 https://twitter.com/sama/status/1758220311735181384
- usaar333 3y agoSignificantly simpler scenery. I'd put only the first at good complexity/quality. 2nd is quite simple, but still suffers from your typical lighting issues that plague image gen. (shadows are significantly off) 3rd has magically appearing spoon and isn't that complex. 4th has a lot of prompt following issues Some others feel quite off -- wizard, flying dragon, etc. Still impressive of course, but not to the degree of what I saw on the marketing page.