4 ms·
Debatable. They're visually too busy and noisy to see all the time.
by Sunspark 3y ago
Debatable. They're visually too busy and noisy to see all the time.
- Someone 3y agoI think laptop users rarely see much of their wallpaper, and that’s a significant fraction of users. You could even argue that, if you see your wallpaper close to “all the time”, your monitors are larger than you need most of the time.
- MSFT_Edging 3y agoJokes on you, I give my terminals a slight opacity so I can see the wallpaper all the time. Sometimes I'll keep an empty workspace up just to declutter and focus on something on the other monitor.
- StefanBatory 3y agoSame - I always keep some opacity on my windows and I use gaps on i3 It's not necessary, I could as well set black wallpaper and no gaps, but I like it so it's good enough excuse ;)
- MSFT_Edging 3y agoIt just feels good, like soft, indirect, amber lighting.
- nomel 3y agoI agree completely. The best wallpaper is pure black. I haven't used anything other than black in ~20 years.
- jacurtis 3y agoblack wallpaper will be awesome for battery life once OLED laptop screens come out
- tambourine_man 3y ago50% gray is the way to go. I've been doing it since we had to simulate gray by dithering black and white pixels.
- nxobject 3y agoI agree. Black and white often pop up against certain types of content (e.g. white spreadsheets on black background, dark mode terminals on white), but gray's a good compromise.