4 ms·
> I really expected Apple's headset to do better. I never thought they would ship a headset with an image that's so soft around the corners. Just out of curios
by D13Fd 3y ago
> I really expected Apple's headset to do better. I never thought they would ship a headset with an image that's so soft around the corners.
Just out of curiosity, are you speaking from direct experience with a headset or based on reviews/photos?
- themagician 3y agoDirect experience. The Vision Pro is the best headset I've ever used, but it's still bad. I suspect one reason they went with a relatively narrow FOV is to minimize the out of focus area. So the narrow FOV minimizes/masks the problem but it's really just as evident in the Vision Pro as it is in any other headset. Unless you train yourself to "look with your head" it's just not possible to use for an extended period of time. You can try it yourself. There is a cone of focus that extends about 30º off center axis. Within that cone things are sharp. Things then degrade pretty rapidly. I actually don't understand why this isn't mentioned in more reviews. It's the #1 thing I care about. I'd much rather have a low resolution image thiat's tack sharp across the frame than high resolution screens paird with optics that produce soft corners.
- eastbound 3y agoExcuse me but isn’t it the physics of lenses which makes it impossible to have a lens that is more than say 60° wide ?