3 ms·
Yeah, I'm curious how much uv is actually faster. npm -> Yarn was life changing performance-wise. I wonder what pip -> uv is.
by paulddraper 3y ago
Yeah, I'm curious how much uv is actually faster.
npm -> Yarn was life changing performance-wise.
I wonder what pip -> uv is.
- the_mitsuhiko 3y agoFrom my testing in rye it’s significantly faster in day to day. There are numbers in the blog post obviously but it’s the feeling you get using it locally that makes it much more fun to use.
- laborcontract 3y agoBun, ruff/uv, polars.. all have been major qol improvements. I’m loving the pace of release with this crop of speed obsessed projects and I cannot wait for astral to tackle typing.
- laborcontract 3y agoOk, here are some benchmarks installing an application that has a couple build-heavy dependencies: Installation times (MM:SS): # No cache - uv: 01:05 - pip: 01:56 # Cache: - uv: 00:02 - pip: 00:42
- eigenvalue 3y agonpm seems to have gotten a lot faster lately. All that competition from yarn and now bun seems to have pushed them to focus on optimization.
- paulddraper 3y agoOh certainly. Npm has improved greatly. Npm features follow a two-step process: (1) Get implemented in Yarn (2) Get implemented in npm.
- driverdan 3y agoI did some basic testing today and uv was around 2x faster than pip for a clean venv and cold cache on a real, decent sized project. With warm uv cache it was incredibly fast, under 10 sec.