2 ms·
1. Better integration with existing libraries, there is a lot of software the exist in C/C++, and a lot of it is weird and opinionated, and having to write bind
by Arelius 3y ago
1. Better integration with existing libraries, there is a lot of software the exist in C/C++, and a lot of it is weird and opinionated, and having to write bindings for that isn't great.
2. Continuing on that, QT is still good for large desktop GUI projects. It doesn't seem it's well bound to Rust, and Rust is still trying to figure out their comparable UI story.
3. Ironically, in some certain circumstances, with good discipline, (And mostly interfaces that looks like C) C/C++ can compile faster then Rust.