3 ms·
If the goal had been 5%, you would say: - It may be simply mathematically impossible to get to 5 percent... And they are already at 9.56%.
by Haskell 18y ago
If the goal had been 5%, you would say: - It may be simply mathematically impossible to get to 5 percent...
And they are already at 9.56%.
- aswanson 18y agoNo I wouldn't have, because I could only make a statement like that after seeing performance information. Since at least 40 teams beat that performance the first year, I would have said they set the bar too low.
- deleted 18y ago[deleted]
- Haskell 18y agoAnd why do you think 10% is impossible but 9.5% is not?
- aswanson 18y agoI said they may have found a bound. I didn't say it was; it said there may be a limit. Re-read the ancestor.
- Haskell 18y agoYou are playing with words. The point is that there's really not much difference between 10% and 9.56%. Netflix's Grand Prize could very well had been 9.64% and it would already had been won, despite everybody saying one year ago that 9.64% might be impossible given the dataset. We will talk again in one year to see if 10% may be impossible.