3 ms·
>I would disagree that you can replace scanning tools with just human review though. You need both. If any of the scanning tools I've used were actually fit fo
by HideousKojima 3y ago
>I would disagree that you can replace scanning tools with just human review though. You need both.
If any of the scanning tools I've used were actually fit for purpose, I might actually agree with you, but they aren't. The amount of noise they generate makes them a distraction and a net negative.
- MattPalmer1086 3y agoCompletely agree there's a lot of false positives. On the other hand, having seen the number of actual vulnerabilities in code left after only manual review, it's something that's a necessary evil.
- MattPalmer1086 3y agoActually, I have a question for you on this. There's a big push towards "shift left" in the industry. I'm all in favour of empowering developers to deal with stuff earlier, but the amount of false positives these tools generate seem like it would just distract. I think some kind of review and filtering of them before the average dev sees them would actually work better. Do you have an opinion on that?