3 ms·

If you have a piece of equipment or property that someone else wants to use, this is called rent - you can rent it to another, or not. It is not tax, which is

If you have a piece of equipment or property that someone else wants to use, this is called rent - you can rent it to another, or not. It is not tax, which is forcibly extracted. What you call consolidation is perfectly natural. It occurs without government. Have you ever been to a large family gathering? No government required, but people work together naturally. However, if you want a whole class of people, living parasitically of the work of others, you need government. If you want to subsidise banks, the military, police, teachers, Elon, special pensions for government workers (bribes), etc, you can't do that without forcibly extracting the expense from everyone else. It's unlikely that anyone is volunteering to pay extra for these 'services'. The trick is to make everyone else things this is 'right', even though there is no moral basis for stealing, so they don't even question things. I daresay you wouldn't think it is ok to forcibly steal from your neighbours to provide a common good (eg repairing a private road). Why is is ok to do so, if you call yourself 'government'? There is no basis, except force. So, if you work things from a position of right and wrong, mine is not an odd perspective. I'm simply not advocating everyday use of force on everyone else. No one has the right to steal from another; if it is done, it is not right, it is wrong. I understand that this seems highly bizarre if you have accepted all the self-serving government nonsense you were taught at school.

taeric 3y ago
Large families are often their own form of government. Complete with tons and tons of rather mixed fungible debts and obligations to each other. Is it exactly the same thing? Of course not. But to think that consolidation at all on the same level as our government happens all of the time is equally different. You are invested in the idea that people only think this through some form of indoctrination. Sadly, you are yourself using loaded language that is very typical of indoctrination to criticize the idea.
- verisimi 3y ago
  > Sadly, you are yourself using loaded language that is very typical of indoctrination to criticize the idea. Can you give an example?
  - taeric 3y ago
    The loaded language is equating taxing with theft. Moving things into a "right and wrong" moral framing doesn't help. And your closing sentence is just flat out aggressive against education and self government.
    - verisimi 3y ago
      Is tax optional? What basis is there to force another to pay tax? Can there be a moral basis for taking another person's income, or is it bound to be immoral, as I think.
      - taeric 3y ago
        If you are truly unable to pay taxes, you would be surprised how much effort the IRS will go to help you on that. Similar to any debts you owe, courts will work with you to meet you where you are. Similarly, if someone owes you payment for something, you can take them to court to compel reasonable payment. If you can never have a "moral basis" for compelling payment, than I'm curious how you think any contract law can work to secure payments? And note, this is in the US. There are places where you can be forced into servitude for payments owed. Or imprisoned for non-payment. Yes, there are prison sentences for fraud in the US, but it is very different from how things have "naturally" worked in the past.
        verisimi 3y ago
        > If you can never have a "moral basis" for compelling payment, than I'm curious how you think any contract law can work to secure payments? If 2 parties voluntarily agree to do something, and voluntarily agree to go into contract and by bound by such-and-such terms, there is no force or coercion. Did you sign a contract with the IRS or the government? No. Your bondage is assumed. I don't care how much effort the IRS take to be nice. If they are forcibly extracting wealth, this is always a wrong. You wouldn't initiate forcible extraction of wealth from another and call it right, would you?

taeric 3y ago

Large families are often their own form of government. Complete with tons and tons of rather mixed fungible debts and obligations to each other. Is it exactly the same thing? Of course not. But to think that consolidation at all on the same level as our government happens all of the time is equally different. You are invested in the idea that people only think this through some form of indoctrination. Sadly, you are yourself using loaded language that is very typical of indoctrination to criticize the idea.

verisimi 3y ago
> Sadly, you are yourself using loaded language that is very typical of indoctrination to criticize the idea. Can you give an example?
- taeric 3y ago
  The loaded language is equating taxing with theft. Moving things into a "right and wrong" moral framing doesn't help. And your closing sentence is just flat out aggressive against education and self government.
  - verisimi 3y ago
    Is tax optional? What basis is there to force another to pay tax? Can there be a moral basis for taking another person's income, or is it bound to be immoral, as I think.
    - taeric 3y ago
      If you are truly unable to pay taxes, you would be surprised how much effort the IRS will go to help you on that. Similar to any debts you owe, courts will work with you to meet you where you are. Similarly, if someone owes you payment for something, you can take them to court to compel reasonable payment. If you can never have a "moral basis" for compelling payment, than I'm curious how you think any contract law can work to secure payments? And note, this is in the US. There are places where you can be forced into servitude for payments owed. Or imprisoned for non-payment. Yes, there are prison sentences for fraud in the US, but it is very different from how things have "naturally" worked in the past.
      - verisimi 3y ago
        > If you can never have a "moral basis" for compelling payment, than I'm curious how you think any contract law can work to secure payments? If 2 parties voluntarily agree to do something, and voluntarily agree to go into contract and by bound by such-and-such terms, there is no force or coercion. Did you sign a contract with the IRS or the government? No. Your bondage is assumed. I don't care how much effort the IRS take to be nice. If they are forcibly extracting wealth, this is always a wrong. You wouldn't initiate forcible extraction of wealth from another and call it right, would you?