>> but he's just wrong here > Ehhh. I increasingly believe that implicit casts are a mistake. I wasn't disagreeing with that part, just the part where he trie

>> but he's just wrong here > Ehhh. I increasingly believe that implicit casts are a mistake. I wasn't disagreeing with that part, just the part where he tries to justify it with "Treating null nullable Booleans as false leads to a number of oddities... neither Foo nor Bar is executed." That portion is not true, but that's fine - there are plenty of other reasons to avoid making null implicitly cast to bool.