> You can do handwritten digit recognition with 90% accuracy? Sounds pretty good, but if you need to turn that into recognizing a 12 digit account number you no

> You can do handwritten digit recognition with 90% accuracy? Sounds pretty good, but if you need to turn that into recognizing a 12 digit account number you now have a 70% chance of getting at least one digit incorrect. This means a product worthy digit classifier needs to be much higher accuracy. Language is essential for human civilization, so are tools. We wouldn't get far without either. maybe a language model can understand what it needs to do but not how to do it, so you give it a tool. Humans can get pretty far without 100 percent accuracy, we can get a lot from AI models before they reach 100 percent, but being that at some point AI will be able to improve itself even remake itself daily with 2x the abilities, 100 percent or at least 99.7 percent is attainable. Right now I can take any YouTube video summarize it and turn it into a podcast, short form videos, and a blog post. There's definitely a lot of marketing uses right now for ai agents. If you think about embodied AI, it's only as good as it's body. if it doesn't have good grippers it will struggle to pick things up. Also with a lot of things, accuracy is subjective one person might think ad copy is great and maybe their manager thinks it's shit. One person could give it a 100 percent score and another a 70 percent. My point is we're so close here, and it's already amazing technology and we can augment failures by creating larger toolboxes.