3 ms·
Thanks, but I'll skip: "AT&T has been named a defendant in a class action lawsuit that claims the telecommunications company illegally cooperated with the Natio
by loverobots 14y ago
Thanks, but I'll skip: "AT&T has been named a defendant in a class action lawsuit that claims the telecommunications company illegally cooperated with the National Security Agency's secret eavesdropping program.
The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in San Francisco's federal district court, charges that AT&T has opened its telecommunications facilities up to the NSA and continues to "to assist the government in its secret surveillance of millions of ordinary Americans."
The Electronic Frontier Foundation, which filed the suit, says AT&T's alleged cooperation violates free speech and privacy rights found in the U.S. Constitution and also contravenes federal wiretapping law, which prohibits electronic surveillance "except as authorized by statute" http://news.cnet.com/ATT-sued-over-NSA-spy-program/2100-1028_3-6033501.html http://news.cnet.com/ATT-sued-over-NSA-spy-program/2100-1028... "
- danssig 14y agoYea, my first thought when I saw this title: "who on earth would pay to have AT&T involved in their home security. May as well just hook up a web cam pointed to your shower and be done with it.