3 ms·
Oh, where to begin with this avant-garde take on climate change and energy policy? It's like saying the Titanic hit an iceberg just to spice up its maiden voyag
by 303uru 3y ago
Oh, where to begin with this avant-garde take on climate change and energy policy? It's like saying the Titanic hit an iceberg just to spice up its maiden voyage. If climate change discussions were merely a cover-up for oil production collapse, then carbon capture efforts would be the equivalent of trying to bail out the ocean with a teaspoon – a noble yet futile gesture.
To suggest that the push towards Net Zero 2050 is a cunning plan to mask the decline in oil production is to give the world's governments and environmental organizations a level of credit for coordination and foresight that would make even a conspiracy theorist blush. It's like believing that all the world's scientists, who can barely agree on where to have lunch, have somehow conspired to create a global narrative just for the fun of it.
As for the grand finale, suggesting that climate change is a plot to promote globalism and suppress a Mad Max-style future of oil wars, is a narrative twist not even Hollywood could dream up. It's as if we're living in a world where every environmental policy is a scene from a dystopian thriller, where the heroes are misunderstood oil barons, and the villains are those dastardly folks trying to save the planet.
In short, the comment is a masterpiece of dystopian fiction, worthy of a place in the annals of "Creative Conspiracy Theories 101." It's a reminder that the real world, with its complex challenges and nuanced solutions, often outstrips even the most vivid imaginations.
- narrator 3y agoThe mistake you guys make is that I'm against climate change activism, and I think it's all a plan by global marxists baby eaters to kill all that's good and American. You couldn't be more wrong. I'm glad everyone is under the big climate change delusion, but I'd never ever invest in carbon capture because it's a huge pile of bullshit. Instead I'd invest in coastal land and coal production because that's where the future's at and climate change NPCs think there's no future in that. So, please keep believing your useful lies. You see, if the oil production collapses and they can destroy enough demand ahead of that by forcing Net Zero 2050 down all of industry and society's throats they can say that global government was a huge success and we saved the planet and hide the oil depletion and everyone's happy. It's actually a benevolent plan and it's fine that you're being useful in falling for the big illusion. The conspiracy works and can be maintained because it's not actually illegal, it makes sense and it's a good lie that people who know the real truth can get behind. All hell would totally break loose though if they can't keep oil demand falling and there's some sort of catastrophic oil price spike. Then the jig is up and everyone's like holy shit we're all going to die unless we hoard, go to war, and trash other economies to save our own. Basically, all the oil importers would go into Mad Max right away if that happened.
- 303uru 3y agohttps://www.samhsa.gov/find-help https://www.samhsa.gov/find-help
- narrator 3y agoI'll consider you right when global oil production goes above 2018 levels. My beliefs are falsifiable. Your stance though is not falsifiable, and is thus ideology/religion. Please tell me if there is some sort of empirical data that would get you not to believe in climate change. Right now coal and natural gas are going up steadily. In fact coal production is going up a lot. Oil is stuck below 2018 levels. If oil production collapsed in half you'd probably say it was all totally voluntary and we could turn it back up to 2018 levels any time we wanted, even though by that time coal production and natural gas will probably create a net increase in CO2 emissions and the temperature will probably be about the same. The Data: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/oil-production-by-region?time=2018..latest https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/oil-production-by-region?...