3 ms·
Interleaving is so synchronous. You have to liberate yourself from tick-tock synchrony. There are 'a' and 'b' processes, they generate messages. You cannot pr
by mikhailfranco 3y ago
Interleaving is so synchronous.
You have to liberate yourself from tick-tock synchrony.
There are 'a' and 'b' processes, they generate messages. You cannot predict how those will arrive. If you want them strictly alternating, you can tag each of the messages with the source, and block until you get the next other one you expect. Or you can just receive them all and make sense of them on their own terms.
- Joker_vD 3y ago> You have to liberate yourself from tick-tock synchrony. Thank you for telling me which kinds of program I am not allowed to write any more in the bright new future of the programming. As for the rest of your comment, I am aware of CSP and its derivatives, thanks. The question was about the language proposed in TFA that seems to be lacking the choice/select primitive.