4 ms·
Swift having and voicing an opinion is not a "conspiracy". She should be able to, as any American, hold and feel free to voice her beliefs. Of course she might
by uberman 3y ago
Swift having and voicing an opinion is not a "conspiracy". She should be able to, as any American, hold and feel free to voice her beliefs. Of course she might choose not to do so no matter who begs and that is also fine. There is no conspiracy here. You might or might not like it that she could do so, but others might like or not like that Tucker Carlson or Rachel Maddow can and do so.
The "conspiracy" is/was that Swift is an active psyOp warrior in the employ of the CIA and/or Pentagon, that the Super Bowl is/was rigged to get the Chiefs into the game, a game that would be scripted so that they would win. Then, in the post game celebration Swift would be whisked onto the field where she would gush in the afterglow of the Cheif's victory and then live on camera she would endorse Biden. Some additionally believed that following her endorsement Biden himself would be choppered into the stadium and appear with Swift.
Per the poll,
"Do you think that a covert government effort for Taylor Swift to help Joe Biden win the presidential election actually exists, or not?"
18% of people surveyed believe that Swift is a psyop warrior and that the Super Bowl and in fact the entire NFL season was scripted to get her into position to complete her mission. Presumably a mission now thwarted thanks to it's unmasking.
- coldtea 3y ago>"Do you think that a covert government effort for Taylor Swift to help Joe Biden win the presidential election actually exists, or not?" Which doesn't need to be anything about a "CIA psyop". I believe the above is (or could very realistically be) the case, and I could very well answer "yes" to that, without any "CIA psyop" need be involved. In other words, that people from the Biden administration and PR team, working to get Swift to endorse him publicly, and perhaps do a few stunts with him (with or without an exchange of money or favors involved), for the obvious election marketing reasons. That's not the same as a conspiracy in the "illuminati" or "CIA is behind this" sense (as it's made to be), nor is it the same as just "Swift having and voicing an opinion".
- 082349872349872 3y ago> people from the Biden administration and PR team, working to get Swift to endorse him publicly sounds like you're making "covert" do a lot of work here; as far as I have seen that effort is better described by "overt"
- coldtea 3y agoI'm not making it do anything. In fact, my opening comment reads: "What conspiracy? If anything, it's overt" It's the TFA that presents belief in that as if people believe in a "conspiracy".
- uberman 3y agoWho/what is the TFA?
- 082349872349872 3y agoThe Fine Article: https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/MonmouthPoll_US_021424/ https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/MonmouthP... > 34.Do you think that a covert government effort for Taylor Swift to help Joe Biden win the presidential election actually exists, or not? see also https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39373632 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39373632 I guess we could spin this as "18% of people polled have an idiosyncratic definition of covert", but given the context, I find understanding of the usual def'n to be most likely.
- uberman 3y agoYou might not like a political party soliciting a celebrity endorsement but that does not make it a conspiracy and that is not this conspiracy. This conspiracy is being floated and propagated by people like: Paraphrased... Fox News host Jesse Watters: "Swift is a Pentagon PsyOp Agent" GOP candidate Vivek Ramaswamy: "The Super Bowl is rigged to boost the profile of Taylor Swift ahead of her plans to endorse President Biden" OAN News: "Swift is a “Massive Super Bowl Psy-op” a brainwashing campaign designed to indoctrinate citizens to an elite agenda and away from religion." Try a google search for "Super Bowl Psy-op" if you have any doubts.