> Let's say GPT 4 is not good enough to completely replace any human. Let's say GPT-5's improvements allow it to replace the bottom 10% of white collar jobs. Th

> Let's say GPT 4 is not good enough to completely replace any human. Let's say GPT-5's improvements allow it to replace the bottom 10% of white collar jobs. That alone, discounting the productivity improvements for people who use it but aren't replaced by it, would offset the even enormous upfront costs. You're also forgetting the positive climate impact of eliminating those people's CO2 production. /s