4 ms·
I don't want to sound negative, but this will probably be the end for the project. At least I am not interested in a non-free GUI framework, and I think the maj
by albertzeyer 3y ago
I don't want to sound negative, but this will probably be the end for the project. At least I am not interested in a non-free GUI framework, and I think the majority of other developers think the same.
If you really want to commercialize this project, maybe a double licence like Qt is a better option?
But I wonder: Those people who use this could also support its development. Or if no-one is supporting the development, maybe there is simply not enough interest by other people in this project? If this is the case, why keeping it alive? Making it commercial will have the opposite effect, it will reduce the interest much more.
Despite that it is commercial now, even before, I was not really sure why I would use this over some of the more well known frameworks.
- Forymanarysanar 3y agoNo, this may be the beginning or the only way to keep the project alive. Open source is good and such, but never could answer one question: funding. Without proper funding, project that you like to work on is ultimately doomed as pure enthusiasm won't drive you too far.