2 ms·
Why would you include "We Pirates will now fight even harder for our digital privacy of correspondence!" (and then continuing to link their website as a source
by Aachen 3y ago
Why would you include "We Pirates will
now fight even harder for our digital privacy of correspondence!" (and then continuing to link their website as a source of truth on the matter) in a non-promotional piece? This is an advertisement, not a news article
One which I agree with, to be clear. I'm not opposed to the pirate party's views on digital matters. This party's goals/narrative just has no place in a piece about a court case
- tokai 3y agoI'm not arguing that with you. You misunderstood what was going on here, edited your comments many times, and now you want to discuss the article linked instead of the actual news (the judgement). Calm down.
- Aachen 3y agoI edited in more info as I found it, trying to be helpful for what's currently the top comment. Sorry if that's not okay
- chefandy 3y agoThere’s a disclaimer at the bottom of the article that says they publish articles from a variety of sources, and that the viewpoints expressed aren’t necessarily their own, etc. Considering that it does seem to have an angle, the byline says it’s from their own unnamed correspondent, it’s not called an opinion piece, and there’s no link to the original, I’m guessing their slightly unpredictable correspondent’s surname is GPT.
- rmbyrro 3y agoC'mon, let's let people write pationately about issues they hold in their hearts. I can totally understand why they're so passionate about this topic in particular. We don't have much left of democracy in the world. If electronic privacy is destroyed like some EU leaders want, there will be close to nothing left.