4 ms·
Sorry, you'll have to excuse that I'm not immediately a huge fan of corporations who give small amounts of money for significant amounts of research that ultima
by jmtame 18y ago
Sorry, you'll have to excuse that I'm not immediately a huge fan of corporations who give small amounts of money for significant amounts of research that ultimately go back to benefit the corporation.
Apparently, they're going to give all of the code out, which is good to hear. I'm proud of the machine learning community for that. As for Netflix, it's difficult for me to believe this is really about research and not about increasing their profitability.
I could be way off. Maybe $1 million over the course of 2+ years is a heck of a lot of money for a team of developers (selected from 35,000 teams), which will be used to generate more profit for NetFlix. Who knows. I'm glad that so far over 2 years, $100k was given out. That's good to see.
- plinkplonk 18y agoWhy is this downmodded? I can understand people disagreeing, but it is a well articulated point.
- unalone 18y agoI downvoted after reading the first sentence. Sorry, you'll have to excuse that I'm not immediately a huge fan of corporations who give small amounts of money for significant amounts of research that ultimately go back to benefit the corporation. While the statement that followed was at least reasonable, that line struck me as really obnoxious.
- zack 18y agoColorless green ideas sleep furiously.
- deleted 18y ago[deleted]
- byrneseyeview 18y agoAs for Netflix, it's difficult for me to believe this is really about research and not about increasing their profitability. Are you really more concerned with the purity of their motives that the results of their actions? I would rather interact with people who can accomplish stuff for selfish reasons than people who fail hard but feel good for trying.
- jmtame 18y agoI'm not concerned, I just said it's great that after 2 years of work, we've seen $100k come from it. That is wonderful news.