3 ms·
the sentence itself should be alarming. the claim is that a dataset was created. of words and of videos, and that it was created from public datasets of books
by catchnear4321 3y ago
the sentence itself should be alarming.
the claim is that a dataset was created. of words and of videos, and that it was created from public datasets of books and videos, those datasets containing books, and videos.
it takes too many words to say almost nothing.
nothing to see here.
if that isn’t the intent, then the authors need to do better.
- pk-protect-ai 3y agoThe information is in the model card though: Books3 dataset 700B text-image pairs from Laion-2B-en, filtered to only keep images with at least 256 resolution 400M text-image pairs from COYO-700M, filtered to only keep images with at least 256 resolution 10M text-video pairs from WebVid10M 3M text-video pairs from a subset of InternVid10M 73K text-video chat pairs from Valley-Instruct-73K 100K text-video chat pairs from Video-ChatGPT
- catchnear4321 3y agowouldn’t that have been a cleaner explanation than the sentence provided? books and videos, see model card. the redundant language is a smell whether the emitter wishes to acknowledge or not. the point still stands, the hot mess of a sentence didn’t need to be that way. > …so petty and pedantic… if nothing else, think of the language models that need to digest this. sure you can send in gobbledygook and get out plausibly sense, but why? llms will push pedantry to the forefront. or suffer from it. who knows. have fun.
- lern_too_spel 3y agoYou've never decided to rewrite a sentence and forgot to check the entire sentence again after an incomplete refactoring? I'd say you're in the minority. This is a v1 draft on Arxiv. I don't expect the final paper to have that sentence.
- catchnear4321 3y agohence the feedback.