3 ms·
Amusingly, the project/company that the person you're replying to is using .AI domain (see their HN bio), so clearly their opinions about how ccTLDs shouldn't e
by benjojo12 3y ago
Amusingly, the project/company that the person you're replying to is using .AI domain (see their HN bio), so clearly their opinions about how ccTLDs shouldn't exist can't be that strong
- echelon 3y agoIt shouldn't be a ccTLD. Look at these arbitrary .ai ccTLD rules [1], as originally posted by p4bl0: > The terms and conditions of .ai domain names include things such as "not asking for investors" (without an Anguilla license to be a bank, broker, public company, ICO, exchange, or gambling site) and "not violating copyrights", both of which are… complicated for a lot of AI-related startups that chose to use a .ai domain. That's arbitrary and horrible. Thoughts shouldn't be so encumbered. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39367730 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39367730
- seszett 3y agoThese don't seem arbitrary but totally in line with what a ccTLD means. Domains with the .ai TLD must obviously respect Anguilla law, just like the use .gov is restricted by the US government.
- krab 3y agoThey mean .ai should exist but it shouldn't be managed by a foreign country. ;-)
- tsimionescu 3y agoI think they believe that .ai should exist as a TLD, but not as a ccTLD. They'd basically like the Anguilles to not be in control of this TLD. Using it despite that is not inconsistent. Not that I agree with them, by the way. ccTLDs have to exist, countries have an obvious write to host their own TLDs without having to rely on others.