4 ms·
> Though I think that training data is totally a violation of copyright, OpenAI really needs to win. I’d argue that that’s not really how the law is supposed t
by tailspin2019 3y ago
> Though I think that training data is totally a violation of copyright, OpenAI really needs to win.
I’d argue that that’s not really how the law is supposed to work.
- TillE 3y agoUltimately it's gonna come down to new legislation, and there is just absolutely no chance of "big tech gets to exploit every copyrighted work on the planet for free". Definitely not in the US or Europe. Big media companies don't want that, zillions of small creators don't want that, the public at large has no great affection for giant tech companies getting even more power.
- blackoil 3y ago> Big media companies don't want that Big Media isn't worried about you drawing Shrek or Donald Duck at home by hand or by GPT. They won't like you distributing it profitably, but they already have tools against that. They'll also like few billions coming their way but that everyone likes. Small Creator are worried about getting the next gig as AI may take away low end of the jobs, and they are not worried about copyright implications of the LLMs. General Public doesn't like Tech companies but loves the products they make, nobody stopped using early Youtube or Telegram because there was piracy happening.
- kzrdude 3y agoWell, the objection to current copyright laws is that those laws are not how copyright ought to work.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- thebruce87m 3y agoIsn’t that what “jury nullification” is? Deciding that a law is trash and you’re just going to do whatever instead? I realise this requires a jury which isn’t the case for everything.