6 ms·
Apple, Microsoft win exemptions for iMessage, Bing from EU rules
- thriftwy 3y agoThe peasant class will still have to comply, though.
- JumpCrisscross 3y agoThe peasant class of messaging platform owners? What?
- sakjur 3y agoCurrent list of gatekeepers is FAAMG and TikTok[2], and to be considered for it requires three years worth of a large market share[1]. Not even Discord or Slack seem to make the cut at the moment, so I wouldn’t be too worried about the “peasant class” being forced to comply with the DMA. [1] https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/digital-markets-act-ensuring-fair-and-open-digital-markets_en https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-... [2] https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/gatekeepers_en https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/gatekeepers_en
- arielcostas 3y agoOh those poor peasants at Google, Meta, Microsoft and TikTok, being forced by the big, evil EU to open up their platforms to prevent market abuse...
- jackjeff 3y agoNobody uses iMessage over here. WhatsApp dominates. It’s always amusing to hear Americans complain about the lock-in of blue bubbles.
- kasperni 3y ago> Nobody uses iMessage over here. WhatsApp dominates. Not true, this really depends on the country.
- dimask 3y agoIt depends whether whatsapp or viber or messenger dominates, but not whether iMessage is widely used or not.
- wkat4242 3y agoYeah the only country where iMessage is slightly big is the UK and they obviously aren't part of the EU anymore
- kasperni 3y agoI'n Denmark almost 70% of the population uses iOS. So iMessage is definitely the dominating platform here.
- TheLoafOfBread 3y agoI used to have an iPhone and never opened iMessage. I was thinking that it is different name for SMS. So 70% iOS penetration doesn't mean 70% iMessage use.
- ThePowerOfFuet 3y agoYou are the exception in this case.
- guappa 3y agoIt's whatsapp or telegram, i've heard of viber.
- gorbypark 3y agoViber was pretty popular here (Spain) before WhatsApp supported voice calling. People used them side by side, Viber for voice, WhatsApp for text. Now WhatsApp dominates everything, with Telegram coming in a very distant second. Telegram seems popular for groups because I believe it doesn't show everyone your phone number. A lot of Teachers seem to setup Telegram groups for their students so their student's don't see their phone number.
- notso411 3y ago[dead]
- zuminator 3y agoHow is LinkedIn a gatekeeper service??
- gnabgib 3y agoAlso "Apple won't be forced to open up iMessage by EU"[0] (12 points, 18 hours ago, 3 comments), "Apple's iMessage avoids EU's Digital Markets Act regulation"[1] (104 points, 16 hours ago, 170 comments) [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39356980 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39356980 [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39357948 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39357948
- jandrewrogers 3y agoIn fairness, almost no one uses iMessage in the EU. That’s why I have WhatsApp and Signal, even though most people in the EU I know have an iPhone. iMessage is pervasive in the US though. That said, iMessage is really, really good and has features none of the other apps have due to tight integration with the iOS internals.
- int_19h 3y agoIs Signal really that popular? BTW, what about Telegram? It seems like it's pretty common in Eastern Europe.
- TheLoafOfBread 3y agoIt really does not matter which one. You can install them next to each other and just use them all at once. With iMessage fallback is on SMS, so people would be paying for each message sent. And that's the reason why it never catch on.
- gorbypark 3y agoI think this is really why it never caught on here (having fallback to SMS by default). I have an unlimited voice and data plan here in Spain, and don't get any SMS included at all. There's not even an option with my provider to have any included. 0.1 euros per SMS, it's kinda crazy. I maybe send 5 or 10 per year, usually some kind of response to an automated 2fa system or etc. If iMessage ever took off I'd always have to be aware of the green/blue bubble thing and make sure to never send a message using SMS. WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal/etc is just easier since you don't have to think about it.
- jandrewrogers 3y agoSignal is common in Western governments, particularly the more sensitive and diligent parts. If you work with government people, and I do, that tends to be the messaging app of choice and sometimes policy. WhatsApp also tends to be commonly used in Europe for official government things despite being forbidden for such purposes, but that isn’t seriously enforced. If you wanted an intelligence backdoor into the entire European political apparatus, WhatsApp is the way to do it. Colloquially and by inference, Signal seems to be considered the most secure common messaging app in governments, though this doesn’t mean it is actually true. I’ve used a lot of messaging apps around the world but never had a need to install Telegram. I know it is used in Eastern Europe but I never had a need to install it even when I was there. I’m just a user but my messaging footprint is more global than most.
- difosfor 3y agoNobody uses iMessage _because_ it was crap and is still locked in. If it would just connect to other messaging networks I would probably switch to it as it could provide better standard integrations with other apps. Unfortunately products aren't optimized for users but for profit and regulation here is dropping the ball again.
- from-nibly 3y agoI keep seeing people comment that "message isn't popular here". Anti trust laws shouldn't be about how popular something is. That's like not ticketing someone for speeding because they are driving a minivan. If anti trust behavior is anything other than bullying companies you think are too powerful there needs to be criteria for the specific behavior that is independent of it's current effectiveness.
- EPWN3D 3y agoSo even when the market in the EU has spoken and rejected the product that is iMessage, we should consider it a market failure that demands anti-trust intervention because Apple is a "bully"? Under what circumstances do you believe anti-trust regulation isn't warranted?
- ChrisArchitect 3y ago[dupe] More discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39357948 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39357948