3 ms·
It'd certainly be convenient if it were true, but the rate of Firefox's market share decline was completely unaffected by the switch to Web Extensions. There ar
by pcwalton 3y ago
It'd certainly be convenient if it were true, but the rate of Firefox's market share decline was completely unaffected by the switch to Web Extensions. There are Firefox forks out there that still keep the legacy add-on interface around, and they of course get comparatively very little use, because very few people actually care.
And, of course, "being user-friendly to normies" has always been among Firefox's chief goals.
- doix 3y agoIt's what got me off FF for a long time. I stuck around on FF 52 ESR(I think?) for ages, the last version to work with pentadactyl. Then I finally switched to Chrome because it was much faster than FF and my extensions were dead anyway. I switched back a few years ago because FF became good enough again. I wouldn't be surprised if others did the same (and possibly didn't switch back). When I switched, everyone I provided tech support in my family for also switched. I did not switch them back because I don't think it's worth inconveniencing them at this point. Obviously my case is a miniscule amount of people, but it wouldn't surprise me if the story wasn't somewhat common.
- josephd79 3y agoThis is what I did. Just switched back not to long ago.