3 ms·
Holding/bringing a device that disables every camera is significantly different and less risky than climbing up on ladders cutting each cable going to each came
by saintfire 3y ago
Holding/bringing a device that disables every camera is significantly different and less risky than climbing up on ladders cutting each cable going to each camera.
As for cutting power? UPS/battery backup. That's defeatable too. At some point you have to say you've reached your limit. Generally you just have to be more secure than comparable targets, though.
Someone using WiFi jamming on poorly thought out security is looking for easy targets, not complicated heists.
- AshamedCaptain 3y agoI disagree. Possession of a jamming device is illegal in many jurisdictions. Wirecutters are not. I could kill all data communication in most buildings out there just by sneezing in the wrong cabinet (personally experienced). And then what are your wired cameras going to do? If the answer is "make loud noises", well, that's pretty much exactly what wireless cameras could also do. There's a reason 'professional' alarms generally prefer wireless connection and battery power (and loss of connection is generally an alarm-raising event).
- tehlike 3y agoYou can wear a mask.