> If you have a 99% accurate test of guilt, that seems like more than enough probable cause to continue investigating, and probably good enough to convict with

> If you have a 99% accurate test of guilt, that seems like more than enough probable cause to continue investigating, and probably good enough to convict with just a little extra corroboration. If you're facing a jury (as you probably are in a criminal case) people have been convicted on far less than this with no other corroboration. It's all in the narrative put before the jury and their understanding of the evidential burden.