> I don't trust MS to maintain software Then you should champion removal of any "old" software they have that is under maintenance-only status. You wouldn't wa

> I don't trust MS to maintain software Then you should champion removal of any "old" software they have that is under maintenance-only status. You wouldn't want security vulnerabilities to go unfixed, would you? > What microsoft should have done is trademark a new name for their word processor the second they made the decision to not open word .doc from older versions. That way there's no confusion. That makes zero sense. Word is still Word. It performs the same tasks (and more) as Word 1.0 did. And Word today still reads/writes .doc, just not versions that are that old.