3 ms·
It probably depends on what it considers to be a "response" it's very unlikely your 15ms is the total response, but probably just the initial server reply. 1400
by dubcanada 3y ago
It probably depends on what it considers to be a "response" it's very unlikely your 15ms is the total response, but probably just the initial server reply. 1400ms is more likely the actual full response.
- withinboredom 3y agoYeah, a HEAD request would likely be better. This 15ms check is also checking the body for some magical text to make sure the appropriate content is on the page and not an error message of some kind. > it's very unlikely your 15ms is the total response I'm seeing 9ms for the entire HTML payload on the server itself, and 90ms from my house. It's just returning a pre-generated html file, so it shouldn't be slow at all, bandwidth/RTT withstanding.