3 ms·
But it sounds kinda creepy don't you think?
by Xeyz0r 3y ago
But it sounds kinda creepy don't you think?
- spullara 3y agoit is all local so, no?
- autoexec 3y agoIt generates responses locally, but does your data stay local? It's fine if you only ever use it on a device that you leave offline 100% of the time, but otherwise I'd pay close attention to what it's doing. Nvidia doesn't have a great track record when it comes to privacy (for example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12884762 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12884762).
- operator-name 3y agoThe source is available, minus the installer. You could always use the base repo after verifying it: https://github.com/NVIDIA/trt-llm-rag-windows https://github.com/NVIDIA/trt-llm-rag-windows
- gmueckl 3y agoYou'd be the one controlling the off-switch and the physical storage devices for the data. I'd think that this fact takes most of the potential creep out. What am I not seeing here?
- Capricorn2481 3y ago> You'd be the one controlling the off-switch and the physical storage devices for the data Based on what? The CPU is a physical storage device on my PC but it still can phone home and has backdoors. Is there any reason to think Nvidia isn't collecting my data?
- pixl97 3y agoIf you're on linux just monitor and block any traffic to random addresses. If you're on Windows, what makes you think they are not already?
- Capricorn2481 3y agoThe Intel backdoor is at the Kernel. OS has nothing to do with it. > what makes you think they are not already That is the point
- chollida1 3y ago> But it sounds kinda creepy don't you think? is the bash history command creepy? Is your browsers history command creepy?
- Nullabillity 3y agoYes to both? But those also don't try to reinterpret what I wrote.
- tuananh 3y agoif it's 100% local then fine.